All posts tagged Creativity

Creative Disruption

Published February 25, 2013 by Mayrbear's Lair


There are many things that can impact creativity in the entrepreneurial process within the workforce of an organization. Echeverria (2012) postulates that there is nothing more challenging for a leader than managing creativity effectively to assist with breakthroughs and the delivery process of new innovations. Idea agents require support and freedom in the creative process. Effective leaders support innovators by: (a) providing authentic leadership that inspires and motivates individuals to perform at optimum levels, (b) understanding and identifying the idiosyncrasies, strengths and weaknesses of creative personalities, (c) letting innovative individuals take flight, encouraging them to keep in alignment with the organization’s interests, and (d) creating a clear configuration of structure that liberates the creative spirit and nurtures a culture of empowerment (Echeverria, 2012).


Simon (2010) contends that another component that can disrupt the creative process are the entrepreneurs who have concerns about technological innovations that may eliminate the need for certain skills; replace workers; and require training on new systems. For example, because of technological advances a small restaurant can attract new clients without a marketing budget through the internet; an iPad case manufacturer can generate over $1 million in profits in just a few months with only a handful of employees; or a voice over company can connect artists with opportunities without expensive hardware and software (Simon, 2010). These are new frontiers that can prohibit adaptation to change.


Although new innovations may be disruptive and cause alarm for some entrepreneurs, the most successful ones recognize new challenges as opportunities for growth.  This is the mindset and focus of an effective entrepreneurially managed firm. A trailblazing entrepreneur uses opportunity: (a) as a stimulating agent to address challenges, (b) to find resourceful adaptations and solutions, and (c) to discover the best way to capitalize on it (Bygrave & Zacharakis, 2010). This entrepreneurial philosophy is in alignment with the kind of corporate entrepreneurship that encourages associates with innovative ideas like Apple’s Steve Wozniack and Disney’s Don Bluth to remain within an organization rather than branch out to create competition. Corporate entrepreneurship support is fundamental.  With the aid of incentives and rewards, trailblazers are encouraged to pursue innovative ideas as well as participate in the creative and decision making process. This strategy can be beneficial and a profitable experience for both the entrepreneurial innovator and the organization.



Bygrave, W., & Zacharakis, A. (2010). Entrepreneurship. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Echeverria, L. (2012). Idea agent: Leadership that liberates creativity. New York, NY: AMACOM Publishing.

Simon, P. (2010). The new small: How a new breed of small businesses is harnessing the power of emerging technologies. Henderson, NV: Motion Publishing.


Published February 4, 2013 by Mayrbear's Lair


Creativity can have a positive impact on an organization’s effectiveness as well as provide an enriching experience for us. CEO, Dorie Clark (2012) suggests that there are two significant types of creativity: (a) conceptual or theoretical; and (b) the gradual process. Clark purports that the conceptual or theoretical process of creativity is derived from situations or challenges that require immediate solutions (Clark, 2012). In this context, creativity is looked to as a means to an end.  In other words, the creative process is implemented with the intent to generate resolutions for organizational problems.

For example, a Senegalese farmer living in destitution can look to creative solutions to improve the living conditions set forth by the social, economic and political structure of his geography by expanding his agricultural abilities with the advent of technological upgrades like farm machinery  (Harper & Leicht, 2011, pp. 292-294). This is one example of a possible solution that was conceived from a concept based on the success of farmers in core nations.


The second type of creativity Clark cites, the gradual process, is just that; finding a path to resolution step by step with no eureka moment.  This method is harder to identify due to its nature and is often referred to as experimental or empirical creativity which requires time for development and evolution.

Clark offers three tips she believes are significant for stimulating the creative process:

  1. Bring both types of thinkers to the table – conceptual and gradual process.  Their opposing views and arguments offer a ripe atmosphere for new creation.
  2. Offer rewards – Rewards (like mid-career innovation) in the form of grants, prices, and other resources.
  3. Nurture experimental thinking – When this is done correctly, working on something new and completely different affords the opportunity to learn new techniques, new concepts, and new systems.

Albert Einstein

The creative process is complex. The more variety of methods and ideas, the better. Michalko (2001) focused his studies on individuals at the genius level.  His observations conclude that most geniuses think productively, not re-productively.  When confronted with a challenge, they ask themselves how many different ways they can crack the problem, rethink it and solve it, rather than follow traditional methods.  Geniuses tend to think out of the box; outside the norm and implement unconventional methods.  Productive thinking generates many alternative angles, taking into consideration the least and the most likely approaches.  In short, there is a willingness to explore all avenues.  Einstein for example, said that if the average individual were asked to find a needle in a haystack, that person would stop upon the task’s completion.  Einstein on the other hand, would tear through the entire haystack looking for all the possible needles (Michalko, 2001). It was after all, Albert Einstein who said that imagination is more important than knowledge.

In contrast, reproductive thinkers tend to foster attitudes of rigidity and an unwillingness to try new things. They are set in their ways, comfortable with the norms and repeating traditional methods of problem solving. They interpret challenges from a more cautious perspective and tend to view different ideas as foreign concepts.  This attitude puts constraints on the creative process.


Ray and Myers (1986) have a unique approach to organizational creativity. They simply view business as art, stating that capital, people, the markets, and ideas (that have lives of their own), are the tools required. The creative process merely lies with taking these tools and reorganizing them in new and different ways. In conclusion, creativity isn’t a destination; it is a journey that thrives at all levels and in all phases of a business. These are just a few concepts one can look at when opening the door to the creative process.



Clark, D. (2012, April 3). Three ways to foster creativity in your organization. Retrieved January 21, 2013, from

Harper, C., & Leicht, K. (2011). Exploring social change American and the world (6th ed.). Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Michalko, M. (2001). Cracking creativity: The secrets of creative genius. Berkeley, CA: Ten Speed Press.

Ray, M., & Myers, R. (1986). Creativity in business. New York, NY: Broadway Books.